The ever-increasing salaries of newly qualified (NQ) solicitors have sparked widespread debate. While some argue that these pay scales are unsustainable or even undeserved, they are, in reality, a symptom of deeper structural shifts in the legal industry.
Law firms must decide how to adapt to these changes if they want to remain competitive.
The US Firm Model: High Pay for High Pressure
Elite US law firms are able to offer their five-year post-qualified associates packages of £400k (including bonuses) because those associates are working 2,200+ hours per year on the most lucrative client accounts—specifically, alternative fund managers. Traditional blue-chip clients, such as FTSE 100 companies and large banks, are no longer willing to pay the fees required to sustain these high salaries.
This creates a dilemma for the rest of the market. If firms attempt to match the compensation packages offered by US firms in order to retain talent, they must also secure the same calibre of high-paying clients. Without this client base, matching salaries becomes an unsustainable strategy.
Two Diverging Strategies
Firms have responded to this challenge in two distinct ways. Some have embraced the high-pay, high-workload model, while others have taken a cost-conscious approach.
The High-Pay, High-Workload Model
Certain firms have chosen to increase salaries, raise chargeable hours targets, and quietly shed both staff and clients that do not fit this new model. By doing so, they aim to secure the best talent and align themselves with the most lucrative work. However, this approach is not without risks.
High fees can be a deterrent, even for alternative fund managers. When it comes to routine, non-transactional work, clients can be unwilling to pay premium rates. Some firms have adapted by collaborating with lower-cost competitors on large projects in order to maintain their trusted advisor status without pricing themselves out of the market.
Magic and Silver Circle firms are best able to adopt the high fee high pay strategy, however, they are currently outgunned by certain US firms in the strength and depth of their fund establishment teams. While fund establishment accounts for only a fraction of alternative fund managers’ total legal spend, it plays a crucial role in establishing a firm’s position as a trusted legal partner.
Finally, there may not be enough private equity work in London to sustain every firm chasing it.
The Cost-Conscious Model
Other firms have chosen to control costs by leveraging technology and hiring more affordable staff, such as professionals from the Big Four, whose pay has lagged behind the legal market for years. While this approach helps firms remain competitive on price, it comes with its own set of challenges.
Maintaining brand reputation and quality while being cut off from top-tier talent is a significant concern. Additionally, these firms face competition from large accounting firms that already have strong relationships with key clients through their deals, consulting, and tax practices. By bundling legal services into broader engagements, accounting firms pose an increasing threat to traditional law firms trying to corner the “value” market.
The Two-Tier Market: What It Means for Individual Lawyers
As law firms polarise into high-pay, high-workload firms and cost-conscious alternatives, individual lawyers must decide where they want to position themselves. Those seeking the highest compensation need to endure gruelling hours.
Others may find better long-term career prospects in firms that offer a more sustainable work-life balance but at lower pay.
For some, transitioning to another firm will be necessary to align with their career goals. Others may find that moving in-house provides greater stability in an increasingly volatile market.
Preparing for Future Shocks
It is clear that the legal market is not in equilibrium. AI is not yet at a point where it can materially improve the delivery of the most complex and fast paced transaction work, however, as the Chair of Paul Weiss recently made clear, there is a strong economic incentive for firms to decrease their reliance on very expensive human associates. As AI technology matures and reshapes the profession, lawyers at all levels will need to remain adaptable. The firms that succeed will be those that recognise these structural shifts and have a clear plan to deal with it.
If you would like a confidential conversation about your firm’s strategy or your career, please get in touch.
